Iraq's Shocking Human Toll

Our politicians talked about "victory" in Iraq; now they talk about departing with dignity.

There will be neither in the bloody mudhole in which the American citizens have been co-conspirators in creating.

What America has brought to Iraq is about 1 million killed, 4.5 million displaced, and 5 million Orphans. This is according to information gathered by the United Nations, Unicef and the NGO, Iraq Body Count.

Nearly six years after the invasion, the country remains riven by sectarian politics and major unresolved issues, like the status of Kirkuk.

The availability of healthcare, clean water, functioning schools, jobs and so forth remains elusive. According to Unicef, many provinces report that less than 40 percent of households have access to clean water. More than 40 percent of children in Basra, and more than 70 percent in Baghdad, cannot attend school.

By any sensible measure, it would be difficult to describe this as a victory of any kind. It speaks volumes about the repair work we must do for Iraqis, and it should caution us against the optional and savage wars we are prone to.

Ben Harper & Jack Johnson - My own two hands

Betrayal of Principles

At the end of World War II, 1200 heavy bombers flew over the vicinity of Royan in western France and dropped napalm, killing German soldiers and thousands of French civilians, destroying what was once a beautiful little resort town. This was April, 1945, and the German soldiers were stranded, left behind, waiting for the war to end.

During the Korean War, a surprise U.S. air attack on east Wolmi island on Sept. 10, 1950, killed 100 or more South Korean civilians. In clear weather from low altitude, U.S. forces napalmed numerous small buildings, strafed children, women and old people in the open area.

In November, 2005, U.S. Marines shot 24 Iraqi civilians, killing men, women and children at close range. Aws Fahmi, a Haditha resident who said he watched and listened from his home as Marines went from house to house killing members of three families, recalled hearing his neighbor across the street, Younis Salim Khafif, plead in English for his life and the lives of his family members. "I heard Younis speaking to the Americans, saying: 'I am a friend. I am good,'" Fahmi said. "But they killed him, and his wife and daughters."

In war, there is nothing noble. In war, there are only betrayals of the principles for which the war was supposed to have been fought. I don't want to honor military heroism -- that conceals too much death and suffering. I want to honor those who have opposed the horror of war.

Buddhists believe that all life is precious. "No killing" is the First Precept. For those who have, with intent and foresight, harmed or caused harm, their future is determined by the law of Karma. There is no exception.

However, Buddhists don't believe in passivity. We believe we should do something about the conflicts in the world. But we should not do war. Because war makes things worse than they were before. War has consequences which you cannot predict.

What we can do is change from a military superpower to a humanitarian superpower. We are enormously wealthy. Let's use that wealth to help change social and economic conditions around the world. Is this less of a goal than is war?

Global Generosity

Thirty eight years ago, the United Nations estimated that 0.7% of each developed nation's gross national income would be sufficient for aiding the poorest of the world's nations. For emphasis, that is less than 1 penny on a dollar.

I send my warmest blessings to the following nations, who meet or exceed this amount: Norway, Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark, and the Netherlands.

(In contrast, the United States is tied for last place at 0.16%, although (thankfully) individual Americans are more generous.)

What was to be the form of that aid? According to the United Nations, it is to, "make loans tied to particular sources available for use by the recipient countries for the purpose of buying goods and services from other developing countries... Financial and technical assistance should be aimed exclusively at promoting the economic and social progress of developing countries and should not in any way be used by the developed countries to the detriment of the national sovereignty of recipient countries."

In other words, the assistance was to be low cost loans, with no strings and no interference. Pretty basic ideas.

To learn more, click here.