Simple elegance.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Buddhist Consumption
This week I encountered in two separate articles the same individual. These articles were published about 30 years apart.The articles, and this individual, go to the heart of one of the globe's biggest problems: wasteful consumption.
E.F. Schumacher argued in the 1950s that economic production was too wasteful of the environment and non-renewable resources. But even more than that, he saw decades ago that ever-increasing production and consumption -- the foundation of the modern economy -- is unsustainable. He criticized policy makers who measure success by the growth of GNP, irrespective of how the growth comes about or who it benefits.
Mr. Schumacher's economic gospel has two planks: First, he believes in the simple life. He also regards economics as a discipline which should subordinate to the needs of a life guided by moral intelligence.
The least possible consumption consistent with decency and health is his idea of the way human beings need to live.
Economic progress is good only to the point of sufficiency; beyond that, it is evil, destructive, and uneconomic. Schumacher promoted the idea of "enoughness." Instead of ever-increasing consumption, the emphasis should be on meeting human needs with no more consumption than is necessary.
From a Buddhist perspective, it is unwholesome to have an economic system that sustains itself by stoking desire and reinforcing the notion that acquiring things will make us happier.
We end up with a heaping pile of entertaining consumer products that are rapidly discarded into landfills. Wasteful consumption.
Industry Ignored Its Scientists on Climate
For more than a decade the Global Climate Coalition, a group representing industries with profits tied to fossil fuels, led an aggressive lobbying and public relations campaign against the idea that emissions of heat-trapping gases could lead to global warming.The coalition was financed by fees from large corporations and trade groups representing the oil, coal and auto industries, among others. Throughout the 1990s, when the coalition conducted a multimillion-dollar advertising campaign challenging the merits of an international agreement, policy makers and pundits were fiercely debating whether humans could dangerously warm the planet.
Environmentalists have long maintained that industry knew early on that the scientific evidence supported a human influence on rising temperatures, but that the evidence was ignored for the sake of companies’ fight against curbs on greenhouse gas emissions. Some environmentalists have compared the tactic to that once used by tobacco companies, which for decades insisted that the science linking cigarette smoking to lung cancer was uncertain. By questioning the science on global warming, these environmentalists say, groups like the Global Climate Coalition were able to sow enough doubt to blunt public concern about a consequential issue and delay government action.
By promoting doubt, industry had taken advantage of news media norms requiring neutral coverage of issues, just as the tobacco industry once had. They didn't have to win the argument to succeed, but only to cause as much confusion as possible.
In other words, the very industry which caused the problem had in its possession the facts of the damage being caused, and they chose to suppress it.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Daniel Lanois - Shine
This Daniel Lanois album is one of my favorites. However, he is also well known as a producer. Here are some standouts: The Joshua Tree - U2; Oh Mercy - Bob Dylan; Wrecking Ball - Emmylou Harris; and Teatro - Willie Nelson.
Hiding Your Light
In Matthew 5:15, Jesus entreats us to not hide our light, but to put it on its stand, and give light to everyone in the house.A recent I Ching casting had a different recommendation.
Hexagram 36 says that there are times when we should hide our light in order to protect ourselves.
I have found that this hiding must occur with co-workers, friends and family. It must occur, in other words, with the people who are closest to you.
When you speak out to an entrenched people, you will run into criticism and ostracism.
I have found that many do not want dialog; they want to hold to their beliefs, prove you wrong, and resent or demean you for believing differently.
They do not want your light.
So place your light under that bushel; let it glow and shine within; develop the truth within yourself.
Spend your time educating and enlightening yourself, rather than wasting it arguing and disagreeing.
A Little Tea and Irony
Irony is lost on some of our more conservative citizens.You undoubtedly saw the pictures of the demonstrations full of people wearing teabags or tricorner hats who kept comparing themselves to the founding fathers at the Boston Tea Party. Did anyone every tell them that they have the right to vote for their representation every two, four and six years?
Also, these states where anti-tax sentiment is strongest are frequently the same states that get way more back from the federal government than they send in. Alaska gets $1.84 for every tax dollar it sends to Washington.
And of course they have totally overlooked the fact that they were protesting in public areas paid for by taxes; that they rode to the demonstrations on roads paid for by taxes; that they were protected by police and fire personnel paid for by taxes.
In another example, our very own governor of Texas was cheering with the crowd of demonstrators as they waved the U.S. flag while yelling, "Secede!" Yet they called candidate Obama unpatriotic for not wearing a flag lapel pin.
Or they complain about the moral depravity of our citizens for allowing gay marriage. Yet they've allowed 120,000 murders with handguns since September, 2001. Worse still, some conservative pundits have incited their followers into killing police officers and church goers.
Finally, as my very own U.S. Representative has said, regarding the efforts to curb green house gases, "They want to save the planet by wrecking the economy!" It sounds like he thinks we can wreck the planet and have an economy. What is he thinking?
What do any of these folks think?
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
